“No building should have one exit. In a fire, that single stairwell is the same one residents need to escape through and firefighters need to advance up. One exit will never be as safe as two.”
In August 2024, the BC government changed the Building Code to permit single-stairwell residential buildings up to six storeys, ahead of the long-standing national code consensus process that exists to help identify safety trade-offs like this one before they become law.
In September 2025, Victoria Council voted 7–2 to direct staff to look at implementation. Fire Chief Dan Atkinson raised concerns on the record at the time, saying the process was moving quickly and involved limited consultation — something candidates may want to weigh in on.
Independent Risk Rating: BC’s own risk consultant, Jensen Hughes, scored egress construction failure at 16 and maintenance failure at 12; both rated “unacceptable” on the province’s 10–20 risk matrix.
In practice, a single stairwell means residents trying to escape a fire and firefighters trying to advance toward it are forced to share the same narrow path at the same time. It also removes a fallback option: ground ladders aren't viable above the third floor, so aerial apparatus becomes the only way to reach anyone trapped above that height — the same equipment Local 730 is already stretched thin on (see Issue 4).
Other BC communities have reached a different conclusion. West Kelowna's Council rejected single-stair designs city-wide on the recommendation of its own fire chief. Burnaby's Council passed a motion calling on the Union of BC Municipalities to press the province to reconsider the single-exit change.
Local 730 is not opposed to solving the housing crisis. The IAFF's national position is that all housing must be safe housing — for residents and firefighters alike — and that removing a second exit isn't an easy trade-off to make for more units.
Commit to not advancing or approving single-stair egress building designs in Victoria.